The MRCT Center and the Research Ethics Action Collaborative for HRPPs (REACH) presented the first webinar in the Accessibility 101 series on July 9, 2024
People with disabilities are the largest minority population in the United States, yet they are often excluded from clinical trials, both as participants and as researchers. Federal regulations, such as the recently updated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, prohibit discrimination based on disability. Many accommodations are easy and low or no cost. It is incumbent upon all of us to build accessibility into our everyday thinking, meetings, presentations, and planning.
This webinar featured two interactive exercises in which participants learned:
Basic information about disability statistics and disability rights, and, as shown through the Accessibility by Design in Clinical Research Toolkit, different types of support that you can readily implement.
How to find the Check Accessibility and Alt Text features in PowerPoint and write appropriate Alt Text.
How to map out the participant’s (and family caregiver’s or supporter’s) journey from different disability perspectives, from getting to/into the site location, navigating within the site to the different areas they must access, and interacting with different forms of medical equipment and technology.
More about REACH: Research Ethics Action Collaborative for HRPPs (REACH) is an initiative spearheaded by the MRCT Center, AAHRPP, PRIM&R, and Mass General Brigham to curate, align, and disseminate tools to advance access to and inclusion in research—for all potential participants–tailored for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Human Research Protection Programs (HRPPs), and the broader community. Click here to learn more.
The critical role of representation in clinical research, particularly for LGBTQIA+ communities, and an overview of the foundations supporting the LGBTQIA+ Inclusion by Design in Clinical Research Toolkit.
Essential considerations for collecting SOGI data, covering survey and form design, appropriate language in study materials, and the protocols for collecting, storing, and sharing SOGI data.
Practical implementation examples and areas that require further research and guidance.
Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Sex Characteristics Subcommittee: https://www.fcsm.gov/groups/sogisc/
Hafeez H et al. Health Care Disparities Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2017;9:e1184. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478215/
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. National Academies Press (US). Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64806/
Landers SJ et al. Sexual Orientation Differences in Asthma Correlates in a Population-Based Sample of Adults. Am J Public Health. 2011:101:2233-2244. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222437/
Fredriksen-Goldsen KI et al. Health and Access to Care and Coverage for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals in the U.S. Am J Public Health. 2017:107:1332-1338. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508186/
Hughes LD et al. Differences in All-Cause Mortality Among Transgender and Non-Transgender People Enrolled in Private Insurance. Demography. 2022;59:1023-1043. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9942002
Morris M et al. Training to reduce LGBTQ-related bias among medical, nursing, and dental students and providers: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. 2019;19:325. Accessed August 30, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1727-3
Dahlhamer JM et al. Barriers to Health Care Among Adults Identifying as Sexual Minorities: A US National Study. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:1116. Accessed August 29, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303049
Sterling J et al. Cancer screening in the transgender population: a review of current guidelines, best practices, and a proposed care mode. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(6):2771-2785. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807311/
Cahill S et al. Do Ask, Do Tell: High Levels of Acceptability by Patients of Routine Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Four Diverse American Community Health Centers. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107104. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107104
Daniel H et al. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Disparities: Executive Summary of a Policy Position Paper From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:135-137. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2482
Badgett MVL. (2009). Best Practices for Asking Questions about Sexual Orientation on Survey. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/706057d5
Spade D. Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2015.
Brown I, McKenzie M, Srirangam A, Patel S. Making an Inclusive Impact: LGBTQ+ Health Equity in Clinical Trials. Poster presented at Drug Information Association Global Annual Meeting: June 25-29, 2023; Boston, MA.
Data on File. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.
Learn how four organizations, Mass General Brigham (MGB) Rally, HonorHealth, the Society for Clinical Data Management (SCDM), and the CureMito Foundation, are implementing the MRCT Center’s Clinical Research Glossary and how you can participate in Public Review, a vital process to ensure the glossary is a CDISC global standard.
With over 160 definitions, including images and supportive information, the Clinical Research Glossary has been designed to support the communication of clear research information, along with tailored, shareable images to foster engagement and understanding.
Learn more about:
Building trust and transparency with participants through plain language information sharing.
The dedicated team members, and robust process that is followed, to create this global standard.
Strategies and approaches to implement the Clinical Research Glossary content into patient-facing materials.
Introducing Research Ethics Action Collaborative for HRPPs (REACH), an initiative spearheaded by the MRCT Center, AAHRPP, PRIM&R, and Mass General Brigham to curate, align, and disseminate tools to advance access to and inclusion in research—for all potential participants–tailored for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Human Research Protection Programs (HRPPs), and the broader community.
We Need Your Voice: Your perspective is invaluable to us. Help guide our efforts to improve research access and inclusion by sharing your thoughts via our brief survey. Your feedback is critical in shaping the tools and resources we develop and disseminate.
Learn how these panelists incorporate participant perspectives to craft patient-facing materials that are accessible, culturally competent, and easy to understand. Collecting feedback enhances engagement, empowers patients, improves communication, and addresses information gaps, paving the way for enriched participant experiences and improved health outcomes.
The MRCT Center released a series of case studies describing research stakeholder experiences of returning individual results to participants at a recent webinar in May. Given the interest and number of questions we received, we offered three virtual “Digging Deeper” sessions to foster additional discussion and learning about topics that can be challenging to navigate.
This webinar was the third of the three webinars in the Digging Deeper series. Megan Frone of the National Cancer Institute discussed a case about returning genetic/genomic results and secondary findings.
Presented on: July 27, August 17 and September 21, 2023
The MRCT Center released a series of case studies describing research stakeholder experiences of returning individual results to participants at a recent webinar. Given the interest and number of questions we received, we offered three virtual “Digging Deeper” sessions to foster additional discussion and learning about topics that can be challenging to navigate.
