Learn how these panelists incorporate participant perspectives to craft patient-facing materials that are accessible, culturally competent, and easy to understand. Collecting feedback enhances engagement, empowers patients, improves communication, and addresses information gaps, paving the way for enriched participant experiences and improved health outcomes.
You need to be logged in to view this content. Simple Membership is not configured correctly. The login page or the join us page URL is missing in the settings configuration. Please contact Admin
The MRCT Center released a series of case studies describing research stakeholder experiences of returning individual results to participants at a recent webinar in May. Given the interest and number of questions we received, we offered three virtual “Digging Deeper” sessions to foster additional discussion and learning about topics that can be challenging to navigate.
This webinar was the third of the three webinars in the Digging Deeper series. Megan Frone of the National Cancer Institute discussed a case about returning genetic/genomic results and secondary findings.
Mark Barnes, co-faculty director of the MRCT Center and Partner at Ropes & Gray, colleagues Minal Caron and Sarah Dohan at Ropes & Gray, and Barbara Bierer addressed the definition of “recklessness” in research misconduct proceedings, reviewing its history and application, and proposing a framework and factors to consider in recklessness determinations.
Presented on: July 27, August 17 and September 21, 2023
The MRCT Center released a series of case studies describing research stakeholder experiences of returning individual results to participants at a recent webinar. Given the interest and number of questions we received, we offered three virtual “Digging Deeper” sessions to foster additional discussion and learning about topics that can be challenging to navigate.
As an outgrowth of an international workshop held in Dec 2022, Dr. Bierer collaborated with experts in multiple sclerosis to develop recommendations regarding diversity and inclusivity of participants in clinical trials investigating multiple sclerosis.
Dr. Barbara Bierer co-authored a commentary, “The Unresolved Challenge of Triage,” exploring the ethical and legal challenges of allocating limited care resources in a disaster setting in JAMA.
Description: Laura Meloney, Hayat Ahmed, and Barbara Bierer coordinated a modified Delphi process to establish consensus on recommendations for IRBs/ethics committees and institutions to promote diversity and inclusion in interventional clinical research. In this paper, they discuss the 25 consolidated recommendations across four themes.
