LGBTQIA+ Inclusion – Inclusive Language Checklist

Tool

Published: April 11, 2024

Abstract: In the checklist below, the MRCT Center provides recommendations for the use of language that is respectful to and inclusive of LGBTQIA+ populations. The checklist can be used by stakeholders across the clinical research spectrum, from sponsors to patient navigators, when creating participant-facing documents (e.g., recruitment materials, informed consent forms), drafting study protocol eligibility criteria, and speaking with participants face-to-face. It is our shared responsibility to listen to participants’ and communities’ choice of wording and address, continually learn from each other, and ensure that all eligible people are encouraged to participate by the language that we use.

LGBTQIA+ Inclusion by Design in Clinical Research Toolkit
LGBTQIA+: Inclusive Imagery Case Study
LGBTQIA+: Inclusive Language Checklist
SOGI Data Collection Checklist
SOGI: Data Privacy Checklist
Site Feasibility Decision Tree from the LGBTQIA+ Perspective
Participant Questionnaire from the LGBTQIA+ Perspective
Exit Survey Inclusive of the LGBTQIA+ Perspective

MRCT Center Comment on the American Community Survey SOGI Test

LGBTQIA+ Inclusion – Inclusive Imagery

Case Study

Published: April 11, 2024

Abstract: Each of us feels more welcome to participate in a clinical trial if we see ourselves represented in the visual information communicated about the study, study site/s, and study staff. In the case study below, we illustrate how the MRCT Center worked to build LGBTQIA+ representation into the imagery that was developed for a specific product, the Clinical Research Glossary. The tool shares lessons learned by the MRCT Center based on insights and comments shared by the LGBTQIA+ Inclusion by Design in Clinical Research working group and mock-ups of two of the resulting images.

LGBTQIA+ Inclusion by Design in Clinical Research Toolkit
LGBTQIA+: Inclusive Imagery Case Study
LGBTQIA+: Inclusive Language Checklist
SOGI Data Collection Checklist
SOGI: Data Privacy Checklist
Site Feasibility Decision Tree from the LGBTQIA+ Perspective
Participant Questionnaire from the LGBTQIA+ Perspective
Exit Survey Inclusive of the LGBTQIA+ Perspective


The Clinical Research Glossary: New Words, New Opportunities

Webinar

Presented on: April 2, 2024

With over 160 definitions, including images and supportive information, the Clinical Research Glossary has been designed to support the communication of clear research information, along with tailored, shareable images to foster engagement and understanding.

Learn more about:

  • Building trust and transparency with participants through plain language information sharing.
  • The dedicated team members, and robust process that is followed, to create this global standard.
  • Strategies and approaches to implement the Clinical Research Glossary content into patient-facing materials. 

Related Resources


Ethical Considerations in Decentralized Clinical Trials

Publication

Published on: March 1, 2024

Published inJournal of Bioethical Inquiry

Description: Barbara Bierer and Sarah White summarized salient ethical issues in the design and conduct of decentralized clinical trials, including participant safety, privacy and confidentiality, consent, digital access and proficiency, and trial oversight. Given the increasing involvement of decentralized study components, it is necessary to develop processes and cooperative solutions to promote safe, ethical trials, as well as focus on decreasing burden and increasing access for all participants.

Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency (JTF) Biannual Global Meeting

June 6, 2024 @ 9:00 am 11:00 am

Virtual Event

Details: The Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency (JTF), anchored at the MRCT Center, is dedicated to developing and disseminating standards and practices for the clinical research workforce. The JTF fosters a cohesive, global approach to ensuring that professionals have the necessary competencies to conduct clinical trials effectively and ethically.

The public is invited to attend virtual biannual meetings, which happen twice a year.

Meeting Details: The meeting included information about a comprehensive training program in Canada based on the JTF Framework and other updates. There will also be a time for open discussion with meeting participants.

Key Topics:

  • Cantrain: The Canadian Consortium of Clinical Trial Training
  • CIOMS Update
  • Updates:  Deploying the JTF Framework around the World: Arabic Translation
  • 3CTN Updates
  • How a competency-based program will contribute to early clinical research professionals’ training

REACH: Advancing DEI in Human Participant Research

Webinar

Presented on: March 7, 2024

Introducing Research Ethics Action Collaborative for HRPPs (REACH), an initiative spearheaded by the MRCT Center, AAHRPP, PRIM&R, and Mass General Brigham to curate, align, and disseminate tools to advance access to and inclusion in research—for all potential participants–tailored for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Human Research Protection Programs (HRPPs), and the broader community. 

We Need Your Voice:
Your perspective is invaluable to us. Help guide our efforts to improve research access and inclusion by sharing your thoughts via our brief survey. Your feedback is critical in shaping the tools and resources we develop and disseminate.

Related Resources

Panelist Biographies
List of resources shared during the webinar
Questions & Answers
Survey

Global Representation: An Introduction to the Global Representation Project

Introduction


The MRCT Center’s Achieving Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in Clinical Research Guidance Document, released in late 2020 and updated in 2021, outlines a principled, multi-stakeholder approach to optimize the inclusion of diverse populations in clinical research. It is accompanied by a Toolkit, including checklists, logic models and case studies, an Equity by Design metrics framework, and resources to support ethics committees. These are all living documents, and further work, such as the inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical research, is ongoing.

As part of this further work, the MRCT Center has widened our DEI lens from domestic to Global Representation. Over the last nine months, we have collaboratively sought to better understand how concerns around diversity, equity, and inclusion in clinical research are understood and prioritized in different countries and regions around the world and what this means for the many stakeholders involved in research conducted in multi-country contexts. We have several tools under development, including a draft Roadmap (prompts for developing a global diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy) introduced during the [invite-only] Executive and Steering Committees meeting in December and a Diversity Action Plan (DAP) tool presented at the MRCT Annual Meeting.  

The primary objectives of this project encompass a comprehensive exploration of DEI challenges within the domain of global clinical research. These objectives are two-fold.

  1. The project is focused on a deeper comprehension of DEI issues in clinical research on a global scale. This entails seeking insights from key stakeholders such as sponsors, regulators, ethics committees, health departments, Principal Investigators (PIs), study sites, and research participants.
  2. The project is working on enhancing and expanding the existing resources and tools provided by the MRCT Center to incorporate these broader perspectives. This expansion includes supporting DEI in research endeavors within individual countries and, notably, in multi-country studies.

The preliminary scoping of the first objective has brought to light several areas of focus encompassing: the recognition that different dimensions of diversity hold varying degrees of relevance in diverse global contexts; the challenges of categorizing diversity facets like race, ethnicity, and social determinants of health in ways that remain contextually meaningful in various countries; ethical concerns related to incentivizing the participation of groups traditionally viewed as ‘vulnerable’ in research, along with associated risks of exploitation; divergent approaches of regulators worldwide regarding diversified participation in research, both in terms of licensing requirements and the endorsement of best practices; and varying motivations for addressing DEI at a global level, ranging from ethical considerations regarding broader generalizability and global access to interventions to more immediate needs for compliance with regulatory mandates in different regions.

In essence, the project seeks to synthesize these multifaceted elements into a unified strategy that addresses DEI challenges in the global clinical research landscape.

We have been drafting four principal tools:

  • A Draft Roadmap: Prompts for Developing a global diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEI) strategy
  • Embedding Ethical Considerations related to global DEI
  • Working with Partner Countries to Strengthen Research Capacity
  • Diversity Action Plan (DAP) Template

If you would like to share relevant resources or insights, please contact us here.