The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings

Publication

Published on: August 13, 2024

Published in: Accountability in Research

Description: Mark Barnes and colleagues at Ropes & Gray, and Barbara Bierer published an article that discusses the impact of PubPeer, an online platform that publicizes suspected data integrity concerns, on the research misconduct process and the institutional challenges of handling anonymous comments within current regulations. The authors propose processes to ensure that credible allegations are rigorously assessed while reducing burden on institutions tasked with their investigation.

Pediatric drug development issues during public health emergencies

Publication (book chapter)

Published on: August 2024

Published in: Essentials of Translational Pediatric Drug Development (Academic Press)

Description: Mariana Kruger, Moji Adeyeye, and Barbara Bierer co-authored a book chapter entitled “Pediatric drug development issues during public health emergencies” in the book Essentials of Translational Pediatric Drug Development. In their chapter, the authors outline the regulatory and ethical issues that arise during public health emergencies, focusing on pediatric drug development. 

Acupuncture for hot flashes in hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from parallel randomized trials

Publication

Published on: June 24, 2024

Published inCancer

Description: Sylvia Baedorf Kassis and Barbara E. Bierer were co-authors on a paper published in “Cancer” entitled “Acupuncture for hot flashes in hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from parallel randomized trials.” The MRCT Center helped advise the study teams in the coordination and conduct of multi-national, collaborative research.

Proposed Increases in Government Authority Over Research Misconduct Proceedings

Publication

Published on: June 20, 2024

Published inJAMA

Summary: The article examines a proposed increase in government authority over research misconduct proceedings and notes that academic and medical institutions should understand the public, political, and ethical pressures on the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) to enhance oversight of research integrity. Institutions can alleviate some of these pressures by making their research misconduct processes more exacting, efficient, and, when possible, more transparent regarding the outcomes of specific cases. This can lead to improved public trust in the scientific research enterprise.

A Federally Qualified Health Center-led Ethics & Equity Framework & Workflow Checklist: An Invited Commentary in Response to a Relational Public Health Framing of FQHCs During COVID-19

Publication

Published on: May 31, 2024

Published inThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Summary: COVID-19 illuminated the need for equity-informed practices in public health. This manuscript, to which Sylvia Baedorf Kassis and Dr. Barbara Bierer contributed, presents a community-led Ethics and Equity Framework and Workflow Checklist to guide ethical and equitable engagement with between community health centers and the populations they serve.